Since the year 2000, technology has
moved at a significant pace. Schick
(2008) defines Web 2 technology as “a space for interaction and knowledge
construction also accessed by PC” (p.214) and Web 3 as “an interactive space
accessed through mobile technology” (p.214). On the webtrends.about.com website, Nations (Nations, n.d.) believes
Web 3.0 will be appearing around 2015, with some suggesting Web 3.0 could
include computers understanding stored information or even humans interacting
in virtual worlds. What is clear
is that “we will experience a lot of change before it [Web 3] emerges”
(Nations, n.d.) and the internet is becoming “the centre of both our work and
our play” (Nations, n.d.).
(ASCO, 2011) |
I contend that the use of technology and specifically, social media, (see http://www.gcflearnfree.org/socialmedia) must become a part of everyday classroom practice, but also acknowledge that there are barriers and implications by adopting online information and communications technology (ICT) for educators.
Sticht (2011) sees the use of using
ICT with literacy learners as a way to develop social capital and defines
social capital as “the social connections and understandings between people
that enable them to work together, live together and learn from each other”
(p.1). The numerous digital
technologies provide social capital through “discussion groups, Twitter,
Facebook, YouTube and other social media sites” (p.1) and allow
learners to study outside as well as inside the classroom. For an educator, Schick (2008) believes
this interaction means moving on from “dutiful adherence to curriculum” (p.212)
by engaging learners with “real-time online conversation” (p.212) and creating opportunity
for learners and educators to engage with innovation, communication and
real-world issues” (p.218). Casey
and Evans (2011) analysis of online learning show that both the educator and
learner must learn to work together in “nonlinear ways” (www.irrodl.org).
On the Campus Technology website (Campustechnology.com ), Lederer (2012) highlights some of the benefits for educators using
social media in the classroom:
- As an educational tool to “foster collaboration and discussion, create meaningful dialogue, exchange ideas and boost student interaction” (Lederer, 2012).
- Increase student engagement. E.g. allows students to engage with others that wouldn’t normally because of shyness or intimidation.
- Communication improvement between educator and students by sharing information, websites or educators answering questions on Facebook.
- Employment preparation. Using sites such as LinkedIn or Twitter to improve employment success
Changing to ICT in foundation learning
can be viewed with both excitement and trepidation for an educator. However, it is not just educators who
must make change. Organisations
must budget and plan for the use of ICT development for online courses and ensure
that their computer systems have the capacity to handle the added burden online
learning creates. Although online
learning can be seen as long term cost saving for the organisation, “what
appear as efficiencies at a system level are not necessarily experienced as
efficiencies at an individual level” (Schick, 2008, p.209). For teaching practitioners, “ICT use
may be an additional burden on top of current workload and professional
development requirements” (Schick, 2008, p.206). Schick (2008) identifies several key areas educators must
address (p.210)(adapted from Rogers, 2007):
Emotions
Fears and motivation: Can I do
this? Do I feel supported or coerced? Will I feel embarrassed if my students
know more than me? Do I feel safe learning this?
Information approaches and strategies - Cognitive
Calvin, T. B. |
Power/Organisational/Social relationships
What if I make mistakes – will I be
blamed? Will I get acknowledgement? What’s in it for me? Is there time to do
this?
“Technical – Is this practical?” (p.210)
Content resources. Approaches needed
to teach and aids to use. Courses, coaching and mentoring.
Social media is changing at a rapid
rate, and “‘early adopters’” (Tyler-Smith, 2006) led and forged the use of ICT
in foundation education. However,
organisations are more conservative with experimentation and pushing the
boundaries, so therefore “tend to constrain most individuals’ practice”
(Schick, 2008, p.208), making it difficult for educators to break into new
areas of ICT. Schick (2008)
identifies some major challenges for educators, including time to learn and
become familiar with the technology, time to develop the courses using ICT along with the “conflicting
philosophies and approaches to teaching and learning” (p.212). Also, educators often have to contend
with rolling enrolments, different languages, ages and abilities which makes it
difficult to foster “learner-centered instruction” (p.211) that
using social media encourages.
Educators themselves may also have similar “variable and spiky profiles
of ICT skill and knowledge” (p.213) to their learners and
conflicts of their own as teachers being “confident authorities and holders of
knowledge” (p.213).
Ledder (2012) also brings up areas
of concern that educators must plan for when using social media in the
classroom:
Distraction
SOS_Wordle |
Students are easily distracted from the
learning content through using Twitter and Facebook.
Cyberbullying
Educators must
intervene to prevent bullying episodes.
Lack of Face-to-Face
communication
Students reliance
on Social media for communication undermines valuable social skills needed for
classroom interaction.
Conclusion
I believe it is crucial for
educational organisations to give educators time and support to manage the new
technology as we head towards the Web 3.0 era. Not only do educators need support to learn the technology,
overcome fears around technology, but they must engage with social media and
incorporate it in their planning. Along
with organisational support, educators need professional development to assist
them to move from a teacher centered teaching approach to a learner centered
approach. Or, in the words of
Casey and Evans (2011), educators must “find innovative ways to construct
disorder and flow with chaos and build resilience to the traditional training
that instinctively drives them to take control” (www.irrodl.org).
References
ASCO. (2011). Students like social media [Painting]. Retrieved March 15, 2013, from http://edudemic.com/2012/01/students-social-media/
Calvin, T. B. (2012). Pros and cons of new technology for employers and employees [Photograph]. Retrieved from http://www.orato.com/tech-games/social-networks-pros-cons
Casey, G. & Evans, T. (2011, November). Design for learning: Online social networks as a classroom environment. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 12(7). Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/1011/2021
Lederer, K. (2012). Pros and cons of social media in the classroom. Campus Technology digital magazine. Retrieved from http://campustechnology.com/articles/2012/01/19/pros-and-cons-of-social-media-in-the-classroom.aspx
Murray, D. E. (2000) Changing techologies, changing literacy
communities? Language Learning &
Technology, 4(2), 43-58. Retrieved from http://autonline.aut.ac.nz/bbcswebdav/library/Library%20Content/murray.htm
Nations, D. (n.d.) What is Web 3.0?. Retrieved March 15,
2013, from http://webtrends.about.com/od/web20/a/what-is-web-30.htm
Rogers, P. (2007, July). ‘Thanks for pointing out my failings in public’ – and other things you’ll never hear in evaluation. Paper presented at the Aotearoa New Zealand Evaluation Association Conference, Masterton, New Zealand.
Schick, R. (2008). Many ways to communicate: Using ICT in foundation learning. In J. Benseman and A. Sutton (Eds) Facing the Challenge: Foundation Learning for Adults in Aotearoa New Zealand, 17, 206-219.
Social media school [untitled painting]. Retrieved March 15, 2013, from http://edudemic.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/social-media-school.jpg
SOS_Wordle [painting]. (n.d.). Retrieved March 15, 2013, from http://www.bgfl.org/bgfl/index.cfm?p=2576
Tyler-Smith, K. (2006, September). The first time e-Learners journey: an examination of attrition and
withdrawal issues in the workplace-based programmes. Paper presented at the
eFEST 2006, Wellington, New Zealand.
I am speechless Karen. Thank you for an awesome lesson in blogging and making sense.
ReplyDeleteBy the way welcome to the "Lonely Hearts Online club". My family sit giving me "looks" that would shrivel a dried fig when I start online.(Best analogy I could think of)
Perhaps that is why my computer died.
Anyway looking forward to sharing your practical knowledge and experiences I am still a little lost in all the theorists on literacy. When I post my profile you will see my background and perhaps it will explain why.
Averill